Metrics glossary
This static glossary is seeded with the public metric examples currently available. It is ready to expand into the full 140-metric library.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Measures how efficiently a team converts shots taken inside the penalty area into goals, isolating finishing quality from high-probability locations.
By dividing goals by shots in the box, it strips out the noise of speculative long-range attempts and focuses purely on conversion in the most dangerous scoring zones.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Quantifies what percentage of a team's total shots originate inside the penalty area, revealing attacking territorial control.
A higher ratio indicates sustained pressure in dangerous areas; it filters out teams that dominate possession but only shoot from distance.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Calculates the average number of corners a team concedes per match, serving as a proxy for defensive pressure absorbed in their own third.
Normalizing by matches played allows fair comparison across teams with different fixture counts; high values signal teams under sustained siege.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Measures direct goal return per corner taken, capturing set-piece execution quality.
As a pure ratio, it rewards teams that convert dead-ball situations efficiently rather than those that merely accumulate corners without end product.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Combines shots on target and shots in the box into a weighted denominator to measure goal-scoring efficiency across all attempt types.
The 0.5 weighting on box shots prevents over-penalizing teams that create high-quality chances, while still rewarding shot accuracy.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Tracks corners won per match, indicating sustained attacking presence in the final third.
Per-game normalization enables cross-team comparison regardless of season progress; high values correlate with territorial dominance.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Creates a weighted shot quality score (box shots × 2, on-target × 1.5, outside shots × 0.5) divided by total attempts.
The multi-component weighting rewards high-probability locations and accuracy simultaneously, penalizing wasteful long-range shooting.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Measures opponent conversion rate on shots on target, blending goalkeeper shot-stopping with last-ditch defending.
Scaling to 100 makes it interpretable as a "save percentage plus"; low values indicate either leaky defenses or overworked keepers.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Simple defensive vulnerability metric: total goals allowed divided by matches played.
The per-game rate enables immediate comparison between teams regardless of games played; no complex weighting obscures the raw defensive record.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Percentage of shots on target that result in goals, measuring pure finishing clinicality.
Isolates conversion from shot volume; elite finishers maintain 25-35% while wasteful teams fall below 20%.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Ratio of goalkeeper saves to total shots on target faced, quantifying how much defensive performance relies on shot-stopping.
Values approaching 1.0 indicate keepers facing high shot volume; values below 0.7 suggest defenses limit quality chances independently of goalkeeping.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Compares recent goal difference trend (last 5 games) against season-long average to detect improving or declining form.
The differential format immediately signals trajectory: positive values indicate teams outperforming their baseline, negative values warn of slumps.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Raw attacking output: total goals scored divided by matches played.
The simplest, most interpretable attacking metric; requires no advanced data and enables instant cross-team comparison.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Percentage of total goals scored in the second half, measuring stamina and mental resilience.
Values above 55% indicate teams that grow stronger as opponents tire; values below 45% suggest early dominance that fades.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Proportion of total shots taken from outside the penalty area.
High values flag teams lacking penetration or forced into desperation attempts; low values indicate sustained pressure in dangerous zones.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Multiplies the proportion of shots taken in the box by the accuracy rate of those box shots.
The multiplicative format rewards teams that both get into dangerous areas AND convert those positions into threatening attempts.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Total shots divided by possession percentage (scaled by 10), measuring how efficiently teams translate ball control into attempts.
Reveals "sterile possession" vs. "direct threat"; values below 1.0 indicate teams that keep ball without penetration.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Total passes required to generate one shot, measuring attacking directness.
High values (200+) indicate patient buildup; low values (sub-100) suggest direct, transition-heavy approaches.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Percentage of total shots that test the goalkeeper (shots on target / total shots).
The fundamental quality filter; values below 30% indicate poor decision-making or speculative shooting.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Proportion of total shots that are blocked by defenders before reaching the goal.
High values suggest shooting from crowded areas or against compact defenses; low values indicate clear shooting lanes.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Goals per total shot taken, the broadest measure of attacking efficiency.
Industry benchmark typically 10-15%; values above 20% suggest unsustainable overperformance, below 8% indicates wastefulness.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Share of total shots on target in a match belonging to the team (HST / (HST + AST)).
Values above 0.60 predict future success better than goal difference; it's chance quality agnostic and sample-size robust.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Ratio of shots inside the penalty area to shots outside it.
Values above 2.0 indicate sustained pressure in dangerous zones; below 1.0 suggests reactive, counter-attacking or desperate approaches.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Shots on target generated per foul committed, measuring attacking return relative to physical cost.
Efficient teams maintain high values (3+), indicating they create chances without resorting to disruptive fouls.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Composite of corners, woodwork hits, and opponent fouls (weighted 0.5) per match, capturing dead-ball danger.
The multi-component formula rewards varied set-piece weapons; normalizing by matches enables schedule-adjusted comparison.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Weighted average of box shot proportion (60% weight) and shot accuracy (40% weight).
The explicit weighting prioritizes location over accuracy, reflecting that position typically matters more than placement.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Opponent shots on target allowed per match, measuring defensive chance prevention.
Lower values indicate defenses that limit quality looks; per-game normalization controls for fixture volume.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Ratio of shots for to shots against, measuring attacking dominance relative to defensive vulnerability.
Values above 1.5 indicate teams that outshoot opponents consistently; below 0.8 suggests reactive, outgunned approaches.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Percentage of unblocked shots that are on target, filtering out blocked attempts from accuracy calculation.
Removing blocked shots isolates shooter decision-making from defensive pressure effects.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Multiplies possession percentage by (1 - fouls/total passes), rewarding ball control achieved through passing rather than fouling.
The multiplicative format penalizes teams that disrupt rhythm through fouls despite high possession; "clean" control scores highest.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Ratio of attacking indicators (shots, corners, opponent fouls×0.5) to their defensive equivalents.
Values above 1.5 indicate clear territorial dominance; the opponent foul weighting captures indirect pressure indicators.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Successful pass differential divided by total passes in the match, measuring passing dominance as a share of all ball movement.
The symmetric denominator prevents inflation from high-volume games; values range -1 to +1 for easy interpretation.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Successful passes divided by total pass attempts, the fundamental accuracy metric.
The industry standard for passing quality; values above 85% indicate technical proficiency, below 75% suggests risk-taking or inaccuracy.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Goals divided by the sum of shots and corners, measuring conversion of attacking opportunities.
Rewards efficiency over volume; high values indicate teams that make chances count rather than accumulating attempts.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Successful passes divided by total passes plus fouls, penalizing disruption alongside inaccuracy.
The foul inclusion punishes "dirty" buildup; teams maintaining high values combine technical quality with discipline.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Failed passes divided by total passes, measuring attempted difficulty through inaccuracy rate.
High values indicate ambitious passing or technical struggles; low values suggest safety-first approaches.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Total passes per match, measuring involvement in buildup play.
Per-game normalization enables comparison; high values indicate possession-dominant teams, low values suggest direct approaches.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Multiplies possession share, pass completion, and (1 - opponent SoT/total shots against).
The three-factor model rewards teams that control ball, use it accurately, AND limit opponent quality chances.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Sum of blocked shots and goalkeeper saves divided by opponent total shots, measuring collective shot prevention.
Values approaching 1.0 indicate near-total shot suppression; the combined numerator credits both outfield blocks and keeping.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Proportion of opponent shots blocked by defenders before reaching the goalkeeper.
High values indicate compact defensive shapes; low values suggest open play where shots reach the keeper unimpeded.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Opponent shots in the box divided by their total shots, measuring defensive ability to force attempts from distance.
Low values indicate defenses that protect the central corridor; high values suggest easy penetration into dangerous zones.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Percentage of matches where a team concedes one goal or fewer.
The binary threshold (≤1 goal) focuses on damage limitation rather than clean sheets alone; more achievable and stable than shutout rate.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Multiplicative combination of opponent box penetration, unblocked shot rate, and keeper failure rate.
The three-factor model isolates defensive breakdowns: positioning (box shots), blocking (unblocked rate), and keeping (save failures).
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
1 minus the ratio of halftime goals conceded to fulltime goals conceded, measuring early defensive solidity.
Values near 1.0 indicate strong starts; values near 0 suggest teams that improve after halftime adjustments or opponent fatigue.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Fouls committed multiplied by opponent possession percentage, scaled by 100.
High values indicate teams that foul frequently while chasing the ball; low values suggest disciplined defending with possession.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Proportion of opponent shots that miss the target entirely, measuring shot quality reduction.
High values indicate defenses that force rushed, difficult attempts; the inverse of opponent shot accuracy.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Sum of opponent offsides and opponent fouls (weighted 0.3) per match, indicating high-line pressure.
The offsides component directly captures high defensive lines; the foul weighting adds disruption frequency.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Opponent pass failure rate multiplied by team fouls per game, scaled by 10.
The multiplicative format requires both forced errors AND physical pressure; either alone produces modest scores.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Goalkeeper saves divided by opponent shots on target, measuring reliance on shot-stopping.
Values above 0.75 indicate keepers facing heavy pressure; below 0.60 suggests defenses limit quality chances independently.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Ratio of second-half goals conceded to total goals conceded, measuring late-game defensive stamina.
Values below 0.4 indicate teams that lock down leads; above 0.6 suggests concentration or fitness issues.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
1 minus goals conceded divided by opponent shots on target, the inverse of conversion allowed.
Interpretable as "save percentage"; values above 0.75 indicate quality keeping, below 0.60 suggests defensive or goalkeeping issues.
Discipline & Game Management
Sum of fouls, yellows, and reds (×2) divided by shots, measuring physical intensity relative to attacking output.
High values indicate disruptive, foul-heavy approaches; low values suggest technical, clean buildup.
Discipline & Game Management
Weighted card sum (yellows ×1, reds ×3) per match, quantifying disciplinary liability.
The red card weighting (3×) reflects the severe cost of dismissals; per-game rate enables comparison.
Discipline & Game Management
Weighted card sum (yellows ×10, reds ×25) per match, with severe scaling for dismissals.
The aggressive red weighting (2.5× yellows) heavily penalizes teams that play with 10 men; values above 15 indicate chronic issues.
Discipline & Game Management
Fouls committed per opponent shot, measuring disruption "cost" per chance allowed.
Low values indicate selective, tactical fouling; high values suggest reactive, desperate defending.
Discipline & Game Management
Total fouls divided by matches played, the raw physicality indicator.
Simple and interpretable; league averages typically 10-12, with significant style variation above and below.
Discipline & Game Management
Opponent offsides per match, measuring high-line coordination.
High values indicate aggressive, well-drilled pressing; low values suggest deep defensive lines or poor coordination.
Discipline & Game Management
Sum of fouls and blocked shots divided by yellow cards plus 1, measuring defensive actions per card risk.
The +1 prevents division by zero; high values indicate physical defending without sanction, low values suggest card-prone aggression.
Discipline & Game Management
Fouls committed per opponent shot on target, measuring disruption of high-quality chances.
Selective fouling (low values) indicates game intelligence; high values suggest fouls are wasted on non-threatening situations.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Percentage of total goals scored before halftime, measuring fast-start capability.
Values above 45% indicate teams that set the tempo early; below 35% suggests slow starters or strong finishers.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Percentage of matches with total goals exceeding 2.5, measuring game openness.
The 2.5 threshold is the standard betting line; high values indicate entertaining, high-event matches.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Points from last 5 matches divided by maximum possible (15), creating a 0-1 form metric.
The bounded scale enables direct comparison; values above 0.8 indicate excellent short-term form, below 0.3 signals crisis.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Proportion of shots from outside the box multiplied by (1 - possession%), measuring direct, counter-attacking late play.
High values indicate teams that abandon possession for direct attacks; low values suggest sustained control throughout.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Count of consecutive matches without defeat, measuring psychological confidence.
The raw count is immediately interpretable; values above 10 indicate exceptional resilience, 0 indicates recent loss.
Form, Momentum & Match Dynamics
Recent win rate minus season-long win rate, identifying improving or declining trajectories.
The differential format immediately signals direction; positive values indicate upward momentum, negative warns of decline.
Context, xG & Strength-Adjusted
Actual points divided by expected points based on goal difference, measuring result efficiency.
Values above 1.0 indicate "clinical" teams converting chances to results; below 1.0 suggests unlucky or wasteful teams.
Context, xG & Strength-Adjusted
Weighted composite of attack, defense, and form scores (weights W1, W2, W3).
The customizable weights allow position-specific valuations; combines multiple signals into single interpretable score.
Context, xG & Strength-Adjusted
Linear combination of shots on target (×0.3), total shots (×0.1), and woodwork hits (×0.25).
The explicit coefficients reward shot quality (SoT) over volume; woodwork inclusion captures near-misses excluded from goals.
Style, Risk & Efficiency
Sum of total goals and cards minus absolute goal difference, measuring event density.
High values indicate open, high-action matches; low values suggest tight, tactical affairs with few incidents.
Style, Risk & Efficiency
Multiplicative combination of shot accuracy, box shot proportion, and pass success, scaled by 100.
Requires excellence across accuracy, location, AND buildup; any weakness compounds through multiplication.
Other & Composite
Weighted average of away clean sheet percentage (50%) and away points per game (50%).
The 50/50 split balances defensive solidity with result acquisition; isolates road performance from home advantage.
Other & Composite
Percentage of matches where both teams score, measuring defensive vulnerability and attacking reliability.
The standard betting market metric; values above 60% indicate open, back-and-forth matches.
Other & Composite
Multiplicative combination of conversion rate, (1 - possession%), and shot accuracy, scaled by 100.
The (1 - possession%) term specifically rewards teams that score without dominating ball; identifies transition specialists.
Other & Composite
Percentage of halftime deficits converted to wins or draws, measuring mental resilience.
The "trailing at HT" denominator isolates true adversity; values above 25% indicate strong second-half responses.
Other & Composite
Standard deviation of points per game across rolling 5-match windows, measuring performance volatility.
Lower values indicate steady, predictable form; high values suggest boom-or-bust teams unsuitable for accumulator betting.
Other & Composite
Percentage of matches with zero goals conceded, measuring defensive shutout ability.
The binary outcome is immediately interpretable; elite defenses maintain 35%+, average around 25%.
Other & Composite
Sum of fouls and yellow cards (×2) divided by opponent successful passes, measuring disruption per opponent buildup.
The denominator contextualizes aggression by opponent possession; high values indicate effective pressing or cynical fouling.
Other & Composite
Percentage of matches with 2+ goals scored, measuring ability to "break open" games.
The 2-goal threshold identifies teams that convert dominance into decisive victories rather than narrow wins.
Other & Composite
Home goals per game minus away goals per game, quantifying venue impact on offense.
The differential format immediately shows magnitude and direction of home advantage.
Other & Composite
Home points per game divided by away points per game, measuring venue dependency.
Values above 2.0 indicate severe home reliance; near 1.0 suggests consistent performance regardless of venue.
Other & Composite
(Home PPG - Away PPG) divided by league average split, normalizing venue effect relative to competition.
Controls for league-wide home advantage; values above 1.5 indicate extreme home dependence.
Other & Composite
Percentage of matches where halftime result equals fulltime result, measuring game control.
High values indicate teams that maintain leads or deficits; low values suggest volatile, momentum-shifting matches.
Other & Composite
Percentage of halftime leads converted to wins, measuring game management when ahead.
The "HT leads" denominator isolates true advantage situations; values below 70% indicate poor closing ability.
Other & Composite
1 minus absolute difference between shots on target and goalkeeper saves, divided by their sum.
Values near 1.0 indicate balanced matches; near 0 suggests one-sided affairs where one team dominates chances.
Other & Composite
Sum of fouls, cards, and corners from both teams, divided by 2, measuring total match events.
The symmetric treatment of both teams captures overall match "heat" rather than single-team aggression.
Other & Composite
Sum of shooting percentage (goals/SoT ×100) and save percentage ((1 - goals conceded/opp SoT) ×100).
Values above 1050 indicate unsustainable luck (regression likely), below 950 suggests bad luck (positive regression expected).
Other & Composite
(Wins ×3 + Draws ×1) divided by matches played, the fundamental performance metric.
Universally understood; 2.0+ indicates title contention, 1.0 suggests relegation danger in most leagues.
Other & Composite
Goals for^1.3 divided by (goals for^1.3 + goals against^1.3), estimating expected win percentage.
The 1.3 exponent is sport-specific; comparing to actual win rate identifies over/underperformers.
Other & Composite
1 minus (standard deviation of goal difference divided by absolute average goal difference), measuring predictability.
Values near 1.0 indicate steady performance; near 0 or negative suggests wildly variable results.
Other & Composite
Shots on target per corner taken, measuring set-piece efficiency.
Values above 0.3 indicate quality delivery and movement; below 0.15 suggests wasted corner opportunities.
Other & Composite
Weighted average of pass accuracy (30%), shot accuracy (30%), foul/pass balance (20%), and possession balance (20%).
The explicit weights prioritize technical execution; the inverse foul term rewards discipline.
Other & Composite
Percentage of total points earned at home, measuring reliance on home advantage.
Values above 65% indicate unsustainable home dependence; below 50% suggests rare road strength.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Key passes divided by total passes, measuring creativity density in overall passing.
Values above 0.05 indicate specialized creators; below 0.02 suggests defensive or simple passing roles.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Saves divided by (saves + goals conceded), the fundamental shot-stopping percentage.
Values above 75% indicate elite keeping, below 60% signals problems; simple and interpretable.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Saves divided by (saves + goals conceded), identical to save rate but framed as activity share.
Values near 1.0 indicate constant action; near 0.5 suggests quiet matches with few saves required.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Shots on target per key pass created, measuring how often chances become threatening attempts.
High values indicate teammates converting opportunities efficiently; low values suggest wasted chances.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Shots on target divided by total shots, measuring shooting precision.
The fundamental quality filter; elite attackers maintain 45%+, average around 35%.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Total shots per key pass, measuring selfishness vs. creativity balance.
High values indicate "shoot-first" players; low values suggest pure creators who rarely shoot.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Key passes divided by total shots, the inverse of shot generation rate, measuring creativity vs. selfishness.
Values above 1.0 indicate players who create more than they shoot; below 0.5 suggests selfish attackers.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Shots on target divided by total shots, identical to SAR but framed as quality percentage.
The 40% target provides clear benchmark; low values indicate poor decision-making or long-range speculation.
Shooting & Chance Creation
Weighted sum of key passes (×2), dribbles (×1.5), and shots on target (×2), divided by passes per 100.
The weighted numerator prioritizes progressive actions; the denominator scales by involvement to reward efficiency.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Shots per 100 passes, measuring how quickly possession converts to attempts.
Values above 15 indicate direct, vertical play; below 8 suggests patient, possession-heavy buildup.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
(Total passes - successful passes) divided by total passes, measuring inaccuracy rate.
The inverse of completion rate; high values indicate risk-taking or technical struggles.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Key passes per 1000 total passes, scaling creativity to volume.
The 1000 scaling makes small probabilities interpretable; values above 20 indicate specialized creators.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Key passes divided by successful passes, measuring creativity density.
Similar to KPE but without scaling; direct ratio enables easy comparison across players.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Key passes per 100 successful passes, measuring "danger density" in passing.
Values above 3.0 indicate vertical, direct styles; below 1.0 suggests sterile, sideways possession.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Successful passes divided by total attempts, the fundamental accuracy metric.
Position-dependent interpretation: 90%+ expected for center-backs, 75%+ acceptable for attackers.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Weighted sum of key passes (×3), shots on target (×2), and dribbles (×1), divided by passes per 100.
The 3/2/1 weighting prioritizes chance creation; the denominator scales by involvement.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
(Key passes + shots on target) divided by total passes, scaled by 100.
The combined numerator captures end product; the scaling makes small values interpretable.
Possession, Passing & Build-Up
Team pass completion minus opponent pass completion, measuring relative technical superiority.
Positive values indicate teams that outpass opponents; negative suggests reactive, direct approaches.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
(Tackles + interceptions) divided by opponent successful passes, measuring defensive actions relative to opponent possession.
Contextualizes work rate by opponent ball control; high values indicate intense pressing.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
(Tackles + interceptions) per 100 opponent passes, scaling defensive activity to opponent volume.
The 100 scaling makes small probabilities interpretable; values above 8 indicate active defending.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
(Tackles + interceptions) divided by opponent pass failures, scaled by 10, measuring immediate ball recovery after loss.
High values indicate successful gegenpressing; low values suggest passive retreat after turnover.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Team (tackles + interceptions) minus opponent equivalent, measuring relative defensive activity.
Positive values indicate teams that outwork opponents defensively; negative suggests reactive approaches.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Interceptions divided by (tackles + interceptions), measuring preference for positioning vs. tackling.
Values above 0.6 indicate "Maldini-style" reading of the game; below 0.4 suggests reactive, tackle-dependent defending.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Team duels won minus opponent duels won, measuring physical dominance.
Positive values indicate teams that win 50/50 battles; negative suggests physical inferiority.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Duels won divided by total duels, measuring 50/50 success rate.
Values above 55% indicate physical dominance; below 45% suggests weakness in challenges.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Duels won divided by total duels, scaled by 100, identical to DDE but percentage-framed.
The percentage format aligns with industry standards; immediate interpretability.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Total duels divided by games played, measuring physical involvement.
Values above 60 indicate highly combative players; below 30 suggests technical, non-physical roles.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Duels won divided by total duels, identical to DDE/DDR.
Multiple naming conventions accommodate different analytical traditions.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Interceptions per game, measuring anticipation volume.
Simple and interpretable; values above 2.0 indicate elite reading of the game.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Tackles divided by fouls committed, measuring clean defending efficiency.
Values above 3.0 indicate technical, disciplined tackling; below 1.5 suggests clumsy or aggressive defending.
Defending, Pressing & Goalkeeping
Tackles per game, measuring tackling volume.
Simple count; values above 3.0 indicate aggressive defenders, below 1.0 suggests positional, interception-based styles.
Discipline & Game Management
Defensive actions divided by weighted disciplinary cost (fouls + yellows×2 + reds×4).
High values indicate effective defending without cards; low values suggest costly aggression.
Discipline & Game Management
Total cards divided by fouls committed, measuring sanction risk per foul.
Values above 0.15 indicate dangerous or cynical fouling; below 0.08 suggests tactical, professional fouls.
Discipline & Game Management
Weighted card sum (yellows×1, second yellows×2, reds×3) per game.
The escalating weights (1/2/3) reflect increasing severity; per-game rate enables comparison.
Discipline & Game Management
Fouls won divided by (fouls won + fouls committed), measuring net foul advantage.
Values above 0.55 indicate players who draw more pressure than they apply; below 0.45 suggests physical, foul-prone play.
Discipline & Game Management
Yellow cards divided by fouls committed, measuring dangerousness of fouls.
Values above 0.12 indicate reckless or tactical fouling; below 0.06 suggests "soft" fouls (handballs, nudges).
Discipline & Game Management
Fouls won divided by (dribbles won + key passes), measuring pressure drawn per attacking action.
High values indicate players who attract defensive attention; low values suggest invisible, non-threatening play.
Discipline & Game Management
Raw count of opponent offsides, measuring high-line coordination.
Simple count; values above 2.0 per game indicate well-drilled, aggressive defensive lines.
Style, Risk & Efficiency
Weighted sum: yellows×1, second yellows×3, reds×5, measuring cumulative disciplinary liability.
The escalating weights (1/3/5) reflect severity; values above 10 indicate high suspension risk.
Style, Risk & Efficiency
Shots per 90 multiplied by shot accuracy percentage, combining volume and quality.
The multiplicative format requires both high involvement AND precision; identifies elite finishers.
Other & Composite
Weighted sum per game: key passes×3, dribbles won×2, fouls won×1.
The 3/2/1 weighting prioritizes chance creation; per-game rate enables comparison.
Other & Composite
Team (key passes + dribbles won) minus opponent equivalent, measuring relative creative superiority.
Positive values indicate teams that outcreate opponents; negative suggests reactive, uncreative approaches.
Other & Composite
Fouls won plus dribbles won (×0.5), measuring ability to break defensive structure.
The 0.5 weighting on dribbles balances direct pressure (fouls) with technical disruption.
Other & Composite
Dribbles attempted divided by total passes, measuring preference for carrying over passing.
Values above 0.3 indicate "dribblers"; below 0.1 suggests pure passers who rarely carry.
Other & Composite
Dribbles won divided by dribbles attempted, measuring 1v1 efficiency.
Values above 60% indicate elite ball carriers; below 40% suggests turnover risk.
Other & Composite
Weighted average: duel success (50%), tackle dominance (30%), and foul balance (20%).
The 50/30/20 weights prioritize winning physical battles while rewarding discipline.
Other & Composite
(Interceptions + tackles) multiplied by (key passes + shots on target), divided by passes per 10.
The multiplicative format requires both winning ball AND immediate threat creation.
Other & Composite
Shots off target divided by total shots, measuring inaccuracy rate.
The inverse of shot accuracy; values above 0.6 indicate chronic wastefulness.
No matching metrics found.